In Response to Re: Project natal : See, now I an see your point ( and yes the PUA crowd doesn't bear thinking about).. but if you flip the coin and look at the other side.. I see a whole new world for those people who can't for whatever reason develop 'normal' social skills.. those who are agrophobic for eg. It's very easy to think of the damage this technology can do when you're pretty much 'normal' and have a full and varied life...but there are people who maybe have issues like autism (mild enough to not be apparent to the outside world but still can hold a person back) or severe social phobia who could benefit from technology like this. You can see it as slipping further into social isolation, where's I can see it as opening a door in an already lonely miserable existance.
Posted by THEREALDEAL
One of the only constantb themes of my life has been group therapy, individual counselling I have picked up and put down over the years, but the longest gap I have had when I have not facilitated Group Therapy is about six months.
I can see some very exciting theraputic applications of this technology, at the moment one of m part time, when I have some, activities is with a developing local respite service for difficult children. I've been avoiding directly dealing with the little gits myself but I have been working with the parents and professionals on the project. I can see from what I know of the work done with the kids that in some cases this sort of thing may be of help and would save some of the therapists going ga ga so quickly.
The other area I could see it being used is the other side than I deal with in the abusive relationships fields, that of the men(sic) who have 'anger management issues', aka spineless wimps who get off on beating on people weaker than themselves in other words - guess why I am not often asked to work directly with these arseholes

. As already in that area role play and scearios are used but these are difficult to contruct well and do require very skilled therapists to conduct.
However the problem is that technology is rarely driven by the benefical uses and it is the commercial ones that get the big slice of the development pie.
Originally I started here following discussion with a friend about the PUA incident of I suppose 9 months ago and recently this has becoem a theme again, so I have done a little digging and am gob smaked about the commercial size of this rubbish. Running seminars for sado men who think manipulaing women is a good idea is massively lucrative and this sort of technology would have real applications there.
To date one hand typing is still the biggest business on the internet, the last time I checked, about a year ago, for all non sex based dollar spent on the internet the sex sites and services were still making a couple of dollars.
Techology like this will have a massive impact in that area an even the one hand typist brigade who are not using it implicitly to learn how to talk to women are going to get a very warped view of women from it and this is going to have a negative impact in the way tey treat women. Lets face it Sultry Suzie is not going to be programmed to be an avid bagger who likes to discuss politics and her interest in collecting pre Edwardian Porceline dolls, is she?